We audit how ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI tools interpret your site, then fix the technical issues that block discoverability, citations, and trust.
Most companies want to “rank in AI” before they fix the basics.
That almost always fails.
AI systems still rely heavily on search indexes, crawlable pages, and structured content. If your technical SEO is weak, your AI visibility will be weak too.
That is why we treat Technical GEO as a staircase:
Skip step one, and everything else gets unstable.
We check whether your key pages are accessible, understandable, and indexable by systems that feed both traditional search and AI-grounded answers.
This includes:
LLMs do not always process pages as well as Googlebot.
Some tools only parse partial HTML or use simplified extraction.
We audit:
We review practical implementations inspired by llms.txt and “Markdown for Agents” approaches.
Not as hype, but as controlled experiments that can improve machine readability in the right context.
We evaluate:
llms.txt file is useful for your site typeAI does not rely on one source.
It cross-checks what your website says with what appears in other places: reviews, forums, social conversations, videos, and references.
We audit consistency and authority signals across channels so your brand is easier to trust, cite, and recommend.
You get concrete implementation work, not just a PDF.
Typical upgrades include:
llms.txt where it supports your content modelWe feel most at home in:
We also have deep CMS experience across WordPress, Strapi, Directus, Contentful, and many other platforms.
As a software house, we adapt recommendations to your existing stack instead of forcing a rebuild.
The result is simple: your site becomes easier for both search engines and AI systems to understand, trust, and reference.
Short answers on AI visibility blockers, audit scope, and implementation path.
Yes. GEO focuses on how AI systems interpret and cite your content. But it still depends on strong SEO fundamentals, so we treat them as connected layers.
Usually no. In most cases, strong SEO is the prerequisite for strong AI visibility. Skipping technical SEO creates weak foundations.
Yes, absolutely. This is often a technical issue, not a content issue. Example: One of our clients kept getting a Gemini access error instead of a real-time page content fetching. After a deep code review, we found the root cause was a messy schema implementation (sic!). Once we fixed it, the model could parse the site correctly.
If you have the same problem, we can audit the full chain, from crawlability to parsing and rendering and then fix the exact blocker.
Not automatically. We treat llms.txt as a structured signal and testing layer, not a guaranteed ranking shortcut.
It is a way to expose a cleaner, lightweight version of content for automated systems. It helps most when your HTML is complex and hard for AI tools to parse reliably.
Both. We can deliver a standalone audit, or handle implementation end to end with your internal team.
We work with WordPress, PHP websites, React, Next.js, Astro, Vue, and Nuxt, plus CMS platforms like Strapi, Sanity, Directus, and Contentful. That said, those are just examples. Let us know your stack and we will see how we can help.
Most audits are completed in 1-2 weeks depending on site size, complexity, and number of markets/languages.
Yes. We can work as your technical partner, provide clear implementation tasks, and support your team during rollout.
Scope, site size, platform complexity, number of markets, and whether you need audit-only or audit plus implementation.
Share your domain and the visibility issues you are seeing in ChatGPT, Gemini, or Perplexity. We will outline the likely blockers and a practical Technical GEO plan.
Your message has been sent. Check your email for a confirmation.
Something went wrong.